• Title: Logical Statements, Negations and Conjunction

  • Series: Start Learning Logic

  • Parent Series: Start Learning Mathematics

  • YouTube-Title: Start Learning Logic 1 | Logical Statements, Negations and Conjunction

  • Bright video: https://youtu.be/DU4wKBDm2Z4

  • Dark video: https://youtu.be/Jw6KxvMKbys

  • Ad-free video: Watch Vimeo video

  • Forum: Ask a question in Mattermost

  • Quiz: Test your knowledge

  • PDF: Download PDF version of the bright video

  • Dark-PDF: Download PDF version of the dark video

  • Print-PDF: Download printable PDF version

  • Thumbnail (bright): Download PNG

  • Thumbnail (dark): Download PNG

  • Subtitle on GitHub: sll01_sub_eng.srt

  • Download bright video: Link on Vimeo

  • Download dark video: Link on Vimeo

  • Definitions in the video: proposition, logical statement, negation, conjunction

  • Timestamps (n/a)
  • Subtitle in English

    1 00:00:00,389 –> 00:00:01,970 Hello and welcome to

    2 00:00:01,980 –> 00:00:03,569 start learning logic.

    3 00:00:03,680 –> 00:00:05,369 And as always, many thanks

    4 00:00:05,380 –> 00:00:06,530 to all the nice people that

    5 00:00:06,539 –> 00:00:08,090 support this channel on Steady

    6 00:00:08,100 –> 00:00:08,890 or paypal.

    7 00:00:09,500 –> 00:00:10,800 This is part one where I

    8 00:00:10,810 –> 00:00:12,090 want to show you the basic

    9 00:00:12,100 –> 00:00:13,500 stuff you need to know about

    10 00:00:13,510 –> 00:00:15,050 logic to understand

    11 00:00:15,060 –> 00:00:15,770 mathematics.

    12 00:00:16,459 –> 00:00:17,319 Therefore, we don’t need

    13 00:00:17,329 –> 00:00:18,639 to go into the details of

    14 00:00:18,649 –> 00:00:20,370 the wide field of logic and

    15 00:00:20,379 –> 00:00:21,309 formal logic.

    16 00:00:21,770 –> 00:00:23,120 For us, it would be sufficient

    17 00:00:23,129 –> 00:00:24,559 to understand logical

    18 00:00:24,569 –> 00:00:26,520 statements and logical operations.

    19 00:00:27,360 –> 00:00:28,649 Since a lot of people can

    20 00:00:28,659 –> 00:00:30,590 correctly deal with the everyday

    21 00:00:30,600 –> 00:00:32,520 logic on an intuitive level,

    22 00:00:32,630 –> 00:00:34,310 this is often skipped when

    23 00:00:34,319 –> 00:00:35,700 you start with mathematics.

    24 00:00:36,189 –> 00:00:37,509 However, I think it’s important

    25 00:00:37,520 –> 00:00:39,130 to see that we have the logic

    26 00:00:39,139 –> 00:00:40,830 as the foundation because

    27 00:00:40,840 –> 00:00:42,619 we need to define everything

    28 00:00:42,630 –> 00:00:44,110 in an unambiguous way in

    29 00:00:44,119 –> 00:00:44,869 mathematics.

    30 00:00:45,580 –> 00:00:46,919 Hence, for us, our starting

    31 00:00:46,930 –> 00:00:48,319 point would be logical

    32 00:00:48,330 –> 00:00:49,950 statements also called

    33 00:00:49,959 –> 00:00:50,759 propositions.

    34 00:00:51,509 –> 00:00:53,000 Now, such a proposition is

    35 00:00:53,009 –> 00:00:54,700 just a statement which means

    36 00:00:54,709 –> 00:00:56,159 a meaningful declarative

    37 00:00:56,169 –> 00:00:57,400 sentence that has a

    38 00:00:57,409 –> 00:00:59,000 well-defined truth value.

    39 00:00:59,650 –> 00:01:01,560 So it can be either a true

    40 00:01:01,569 –> 00:01:02,819 or a false statement.

    41 00:01:03,540 –> 00:01:04,550 Therefore, when you take

    42 00:01:04,559 –> 00:01:06,029 examples outside the

    43 00:01:06,040 –> 00:01:07,410 mathematical world, you have

    44 00:01:07,419 –> 00:01:09,029 to be careful what really

    45 00:01:09,040 –> 00:01:10,550 satisfies this condition

    46 00:01:10,559 –> 00:01:10,900 here.

    47 00:01:11,480 –> 00:01:13,349 So you can’t take any opinions

    48 00:01:13,360 –> 00:01:14,860 or questions because a

    49 00:01:14,870 –> 00:01:16,209 question does not have a

    50 00:01:16,220 –> 00:01:17,750 well-defined truth value.

    51 00:01:18,470 –> 00:01:18,860 OK.

    52 00:01:18,870 –> 00:01:20,529 Then let’s look at some examples

    53 00:01:20,540 –> 00:01:21,690 where you should always keep

    54 00:01:21,699 –> 00:01:23,069 in mind that we first have

    55 00:01:23,080 –> 00:01:24,809 to agree on some definitions

    56 00:01:24,819 –> 00:01:26,309 such that the examples make

    57 00:01:26,319 –> 00:01:26,690 sense.

    58 00:01:27,480 –> 00:01:29,459 So here Mars is a planet

    59 00:01:29,470 –> 00:01:30,900 is a logical statement.

    60 00:01:31,010 –> 00:01:32,699 When we know what object

    61 00:01:32,709 –> 00:01:34,440 we call Mars and what a

    62 00:01:34,449 –> 00:01:35,779 planet is by definition.

    63 00:01:36,419 –> 00:01:38,110 Then this logical statement

    64 00:01:38,120 –> 00:01:39,379 is indeed true.

    65 00:01:40,169 –> 00:01:41,709 In this way, we can also

    66 00:01:41,720 –> 00:01:43,489 formulate the sentence Pluto

    67 00:01:43,500 –> 00:01:44,879 is a planet which is by the

    68 00:01:44,889 –> 00:01:46,830 same agreement also a logical

    69 00:01:46,839 –> 00:01:47,430 statement.

    70 00:01:47,900 –> 00:01:49,489 However, this one now has

    71 00:01:49,500 –> 00:01:51,069 the truth value false.

    72 00:01:51,790 –> 00:01:53,440 So you see such real world

    73 00:01:53,449 –> 00:01:54,849 examples can really help

    74 00:01:54,860 –> 00:01:56,290 to understand the concepts.

    75 00:01:56,449 –> 00:01:57,940 But of course, they can lead

    76 00:01:57,949 –> 00:01:59,169 to some discussions.

    77 00:02:00,010 –> 00:02:01,750 Therefore, I prefer examples

    78 00:02:01,760 –> 00:02:03,419 in mathematics because they

    79 00:02:03,430 –> 00:02:05,069 are all definitions are given.

    80 00:02:05,080 –> 00:02:06,510 For example, we could choose

    81 00:02:06,519 –> 00:02:08,360 the sentence one plus

    82 00:02:08,369 –> 00:02:10,270 one is equal to two.

    83 00:02:11,250 –> 00:02:12,589 Of course, here you also

    84 00:02:12,600 –> 00:02:13,979 have to know what the numbers

    85 00:02:13,990 –> 00:02:15,250 mean, what the plus sign

    86 00:02:15,259 –> 00:02:16,500 means and what the equality

    87 00:02:16,509 –> 00:02:17,119 sign means.

    88 00:02:17,880 –> 00:02:19,350 But if you know these things,

    89 00:02:19,360 –> 00:02:20,740 you know, this is a true

    90 00:02:20,750 –> 00:02:22,020 logical statement.

    91 00:02:22,750 –> 00:02:24,490 Of course, such logical statements

    92 00:02:24,500 –> 00:02:26,020 coming from mathematics can

    93 00:02:26,029 –> 00:02:27,940 also be formulated with English

    94 00:02:27,949 –> 00:02:28,440 words.

    95 00:02:28,520 –> 00:02:30,300 For example, we could say

    96 00:02:30,320 –> 00:02:31,919 the number five is smaller

    97 00:02:31,929 –> 00:02:32,979 than the number two.

    98 00:02:33,500 –> 00:02:34,940 So here we need only knowledge

    99 00:02:34,949 –> 00:02:36,309 of the natural numbers and

    100 00:02:36,320 –> 00:02:37,250 how they are ordered.

    101 00:02:37,960 –> 00:02:39,710 Then you can say yes, this

    102 00:02:39,720 –> 00:02:41,220 is also a logical statement,

    103 00:02:41,320 –> 00:02:42,380 but it is false.

    104 00:02:43,119 –> 00:02:43,449 OK.

    105 00:02:43,460 –> 00:02:45,289 Then let’s go to a counterexample.

    106 00:02:45,300 –> 00:02:47,160 What about good morning?

    107 00:02:47,600 –> 00:02:49,130 Of course, this seems very

    108 00:02:49,139 –> 00:02:51,089 nice, but we can’t associate

    109 00:02:51,100 –> 00:02:52,419 a well-defined truth value

    110 00:02:52,429 –> 00:02:52,809 to it.

    111 00:02:53,660 –> 00:02:55,000 It simply does not make sense

    112 00:02:55,009 –> 00:02:56,350 to say that this one here

    113 00:02:56,360 –> 00:02:58,240 is true or that it is false.

    114 00:02:58,789 –> 00:03:00,520 So it’s clearly not a logical

    115 00:03:00,529 –> 00:03:01,080 statement.

    116 00:03:01,880 –> 00:03:03,419 Another example now in the

    117 00:03:03,429 –> 00:03:04,679 mathematical world would

    118 00:03:04,690 –> 00:03:06,160 be to say I have a variable

    119 00:03:06,169 –> 00:03:08,080 X plus one and

    120 00:03:08,089 –> 00:03:09,699 this is equal to one.

    121 00:03:10,169 –> 00:03:11,419 So this might be a tricky

    122 00:03:11,429 –> 00:03:13,300 one because it’s not a logical

    123 00:03:13,309 –> 00:03:13,860 statement.

    124 00:03:13,869 –> 00:03:15,460 Despite looking like one.

    125 00:03:16,149 –> 00:03:17,410 The reason for this is that

    126 00:03:17,419 –> 00:03:19,250 the variable X here is not

    127 00:03:19,259 –> 00:03:19,850 fixed.

    128 00:03:19,860 –> 00:03:21,559 So we can’t give the statement

    129 00:03:21,570 –> 00:03:23,250 a well defined truth value

    130 00:03:23,259 –> 00:03:24,869 because it would depend what

    131 00:03:24,880 –> 00:03:25,889 X really is.

    132 00:03:26,779 –> 00:03:28,490 This means that in the moment

    133 00:03:28,500 –> 00:03:30,039 that X gets a value,

    134 00:03:30,050 –> 00:03:31,509 this statement becomes a

    135 00:03:31,520 –> 00:03:32,600 logical statement.

    136 00:03:33,059 –> 00:03:34,669 Of course, such constructions

    137 00:03:34,679 –> 00:03:36,440 are all over mathematics.

    138 00:03:36,449 –> 00:03:37,889 Therefore, they will be important

    139 00:03:37,899 –> 00:03:39,440 later and we call such a

    140 00:03:39,449 –> 00:03:40,669 thing a pretty kit.

    141 00:03:41,460 –> 00:03:42,820 Now, the next step is when

    142 00:03:42,830 –> 00:03:44,600 we have such logical statements,

    143 00:03:44,610 –> 00:03:46,399 we also want to combine them,

    144 00:03:47,080 –> 00:03:48,389 they are just called logical

    145 00:03:48,399 –> 00:03:49,639 operations and they give

    146 00:03:49,649 –> 00:03:51,440 us new logical statements.

    147 00:03:52,029 –> 00:03:53,500 For example, the negation

    148 00:03:53,509 –> 00:03:55,059 is defined for given

    149 00:03:55,070 –> 00:03:56,899 logical statement A which

    150 00:03:56,910 –> 00:03:58,479 could be, for example, one

    151 00:03:58,490 –> 00:03:59,970 plus one is equal to two.

    152 00:04:00,800 –> 00:04:02,440 Then the new logical statement,

    153 00:04:02,449 –> 00:04:04,210 the negation of A is denoted

    154 00:04:04,220 –> 00:04:05,110 by this line.

    155 00:04:05,119 –> 00:04:07,100 In front of A, you should

    156 00:04:07,110 –> 00:04:08,740 read it as not A and it

    157 00:04:08,750 –> 00:04:10,160 simply switches the truth

    158 00:04:10,169 –> 00:04:10,740 value.

    159 00:04:11,289 –> 00:04:12,240 Therefore, the best thing

    160 00:04:12,250 –> 00:04:14,100 to define such a logic operation

    161 00:04:14,110 –> 00:04:15,699 is to use a so called truth

    162 00:04:15,710 –> 00:04:17,220 table where we put in all

    163 00:04:17,230 –> 00:04:18,820 possible inputs and the

    164 00:04:18,829 –> 00:04:20,059 corresponding outcomes.

    165 00:04:20,908 –> 00:04:22,158 Of course, here we only have

    166 00:04:22,169 –> 00:04:22,998 two inputs.

    167 00:04:23,009 –> 00:04:24,838 A could be either true or

    168 00:04:24,848 –> 00:04:25,378 false.

    169 00:04:25,769 –> 00:04:26,919 So the truth value should

    170 00:04:26,928 –> 00:04:27,618 be switched.

    171 00:04:27,628 –> 00:04:29,378 So not a should be false

    172 00:04:29,389 –> 00:04:30,989 when A is true and the other

    173 00:04:30,998 –> 00:04:31,579 way around.

    174 00:04:32,239 –> 00:04:32,619 OK.

    175 00:04:32,630 –> 00:04:33,959 Also here let’s look at some

    176 00:04:33,970 –> 00:04:35,660 examples to get an idea what

    177 00:04:35,670 –> 00:04:36,739 we are talking about.

    178 00:04:37,290 –> 00:04:38,380 So let’s take the logical

    179 00:04:38,390 –> 00:04:40,019 statement A given by the

    180 00:04:40,029 –> 00:04:41,380 English sentence, the wine

    181 00:04:41,390 –> 00:04:42,290 bottle is full.

    182 00:04:42,959 –> 00:04:44,579 Then the negation of A is

    183 00:04:44,589 –> 00:04:46,140 simply given by putting in

    184 00:04:46,149 –> 00:04:47,660 the word not into the

    185 00:04:47,670 –> 00:04:48,190 sentence.

    186 00:04:49,000 –> 00:04:50,209 Of course, here we assume

    187 00:04:50,220 –> 00:04:51,299 that you know which wine

    188 00:04:51,309 –> 00:04:52,809 bottle we talk about and

    189 00:04:52,820 –> 00:04:53,910 what full means.

    190 00:04:53,920 –> 00:04:55,549 But then you see negation

    191 00:04:55,559 –> 00:04:57,220 is very easy just putting

    192 00:04:57,230 –> 00:04:58,989 in not at the correct position.

    193 00:04:59,679 –> 00:05:01,019 An important thing to note

    194 00:05:01,029 –> 00:05:02,390 here is that this is not

    195 00:05:02,399 –> 00:05:04,140 the same as saying the wine

    196 00:05:04,149 –> 00:05:05,420 bottle is empty.

    197 00:05:06,119 –> 00:05:07,320 In other words, negation

    198 00:05:07,329 –> 00:05:08,630 does not mean the complete

    199 00:05:08,640 –> 00:05:09,269 opposite.

    200 00:05:09,279 –> 00:05:10,899 It just means switching it

    201 00:05:10,910 –> 00:05:11,670 to values.

    202 00:05:12,390 –> 00:05:13,519 As another example, let’s

    203 00:05:13,529 –> 00:05:14,929 consider the logical statement

    204 00:05:14,940 –> 00:05:16,890 A S two plus two

    205 00:05:16,899 –> 00:05:18,209 is equal to five,

    206 00:05:18,959 –> 00:05:20,709 then not A is of course two

    207 00:05:20,720 –> 00:05:22,589 plus two is not equal

    208 00:05:22,600 –> 00:05:23,279 to five.

    209 00:05:23,829 –> 00:05:25,059 Now, what you might think

    210 00:05:25,070 –> 00:05:26,420 is we just have to look at

    211 00:05:26,429 –> 00:05:28,140 the second line here because

    212 00:05:28,149 –> 00:05:29,700 we already know A is

    213 00:05:29,709 –> 00:05:30,380 false.

    214 00:05:30,390 –> 00:05:32,269 So not A should be just a

    215 00:05:32,279 –> 00:05:33,059 true statement.

    216 00:05:33,609 –> 00:05:34,600 However, that’s not what

    217 00:05:34,609 –> 00:05:35,700 the negation does.

    218 00:05:35,769 –> 00:05:37,670 It considers both cases at

    219 00:05:37,679 –> 00:05:38,470 the same time.

    220 00:05:38,910 –> 00:05:40,260 This means that if we live

    221 00:05:40,269 –> 00:05:41,670 in a strange world where

    222 00:05:41,679 –> 00:05:43,059 this logical statement is

    223 00:05:43,070 –> 00:05:44,739 true, then the negation

    224 00:05:44,750 –> 00:05:46,260 here should also be

    225 00:05:46,269 –> 00:05:47,019 false.

    226 00:05:47,720 –> 00:05:48,869 Therefore, please always

    227 00:05:48,880 –> 00:05:50,489 consider these two possible

    228 00:05:50,500 –> 00:05:51,869 worlds, which means these

    229 00:05:51,880 –> 00:05:52,769 two lines here.

    230 00:05:53,760 –> 00:05:55,010 Then if you get the correct

    231 00:05:55,019 –> 00:05:56,529 truth table, you’ve found

    232 00:05:56,540 –> 00:05:57,609 the correct negation.

    233 00:05:58,320 –> 00:05:59,540 Besides the negation, we

    234 00:05:59,549 –> 00:06:00,880 have another fundamental

    235 00:06:00,890 –> 00:06:02,329 logic operation, which is

    236 00:06:02,339 –> 00:06:03,619 called the conjunction.

    237 00:06:04,410 –> 00:06:06,339 It combines two logical statements,

    238 00:06:06,350 –> 00:06:07,989 let’s call them A and

    239 00:06:08,000 –> 00:06:08,470 B.

    240 00:06:09,320 –> 00:06:10,480 And then the conjunction

    241 00:06:10,489 –> 00:06:12,329 is defined by this wedge

    242 00:06:12,339 –> 00:06:13,739 symbol in between.

    243 00:06:14,839 –> 00:06:16,589 You should read it as A and

    244 00:06:16,600 –> 00:06:18,279 B because it’s the end

    245 00:06:18,290 –> 00:06:19,989 operation, which means this

    246 00:06:20,000 –> 00:06:21,510 one is only true.

    247 00:06:21,519 –> 00:06:23,179 If A and B are

    248 00:06:23,190 –> 00:06:24,549 true simultaneously

    249 00:06:25,049 –> 00:06:26,269 with this information, you

    250 00:06:26,279 –> 00:06:27,549 are already able to write

    251 00:06:27,559 –> 00:06:29,190 down the whole truth table

    252 00:06:29,200 –> 00:06:30,470 which you would see as the

    253 00:06:30,480 –> 00:06:31,450 correct definition.

    254 00:06:32,250 –> 00:06:33,649 Now, instead of two rows,

    255 00:06:33,660 –> 00:06:35,220 we have four rows because

    256 00:06:35,230 –> 00:06:37,200 we have four possible combinations

    257 00:06:37,209 –> 00:06:38,989 of the two values of A and

    258 00:06:39,000 –> 00:06:39,380 B.

    259 00:06:39,950 –> 00:06:41,399 Now from bottom to top, you

    260 00:06:41,410 –> 00:06:43,109 know, this one is false because

    261 00:06:43,119 –> 00:06:44,589 we have at least one false

    262 00:06:44,600 –> 00:06:46,149 here, the same here

    263 00:06:46,359 –> 00:06:47,429 and the same here.

    264 00:06:47,440 –> 00:06:49,109 Everything’s false except

    265 00:06:49,119 –> 00:06:50,029 the first row.

    266 00:06:50,040 –> 00:06:51,709 This one is true because

    267 00:06:51,720 –> 00:06:52,750 both are true.

    268 00:06:53,500 –> 00:06:54,880 A good visualization for

    269 00:06:54,890 –> 00:06:56,440 the and operation would be

    270 00:06:56,450 –> 00:06:58,279 to consider a circuit

    271 00:06:58,290 –> 00:06:59,880 with a lamp and a battery.

    272 00:07:00,579 –> 00:07:01,760 Now, what we can do is to

    273 00:07:01,769 –> 00:07:03,329 put A and B as

    274 00:07:03,359 –> 00:07:05,200 switches into the circuit.

    275 00:07:05,959 –> 00:07:07,540 In this picture, false should

    276 00:07:07,549 –> 00:07:09,279 mean off and true should

    277 00:07:09,290 –> 00:07:11,179 mean on and the

    278 00:07:11,190 –> 00:07:12,940 lamp we see is our output.

    279 00:07:13,630 –> 00:07:14,890 So here you see, we need

    280 00:07:14,899 –> 00:07:16,820 both switches to be on to

    281 00:07:16,829 –> 00:07:18,369 get an on output.

    282 00:07:18,380 –> 00:07:20,329 So true means true,

    283 00:07:20,369 –> 00:07:22,209 otherwise we are false.

    284 00:07:23,019 –> 00:07:23,450 OK.

    285 00:07:23,459 –> 00:07:24,559 In the next video I show

    286 00:07:24,570 –> 00:07:26,279 you other logical operations

    287 00:07:26,290 –> 00:07:27,880 that are also very important

    288 00:07:27,890 –> 00:07:28,820 in mathematics.

    289 00:07:29,320 –> 00:07:30,570 So I hope I see you there

    290 00:07:30,579 –> 00:07:31,839 and have a nice day.

    291 00:07:31,850 –> 00:07:32,630 Bye.

  • Quiz Content

    Q1: Which of the following is not a logical statement?

    A1: $1 < 0$

    A2: Earth is a planet.

    A3: $1 > 0$

    A4: Run for your life!

    Q2: Which of the following is a false logical statement?

    A1: $1 = 1$

    A2: Earth is a planet.

    A3: $1 + 1 = 2$

    A4: Pluto is a planet.

    Q3: Let $A$ be a logical statement. How do we denote the negation?

    A1: $A-$

    A2: $\bullet A$

    A3: $\circ A$

    A4: $\neg A$

    Q4: Let $A, B$ be logical statements, where $A$ is true and $B$ is false. What is the truth value of $A \wedge B$?

    A1: True.

    A2: False.

    A3: One cannot say.

    A4: True and false at the same time.

  • Last update: 2024-10

  • Back to overview page


Do you search for another mathematical topic?